Mind and Morality Essay Example for Free

Mind and Morality EssayThe external factors play a huge role in shaping bingles decisions. One may think that his genetic and thornground history has the most influence on his actions, but in reality, the impregnation of a given over situation has greater impact in the choices of the individual. The touchings one lives in ultimately influences his cognizance, decision, and morals. In his essay, The Power of Context, Malcolm Gladwell states how it is the short(p) things in smell that makes the bigger difference and in many aspects this is true. In Daniel Gilberts essay, Immune to Reality he talks well-nigh how human perception about reality is not al steerings accurate.In Oliver Sackss essay, The Minds Eye he shows how on that point are many different perceptions to view the world. So at the same time, is it possible to order what is right and wrong in ones life if all the decisions are a result of his given situation and surroundings? Also the morality for each soul varies depending on their circumstances and perception of their world. Ultimately, an absolute form of right and wrong does not pull through because the context of the situation always changes, but still it is possible to achieve an applicable standard of morality in society.Each individual has his own way of looking at the world that is completely unique when compared to the way another individual does. This is perception of reality and this form is always open to discussion because the person generates this viewpoint. Each individual makes his decisions based on his perception of the world. The processes by which we generate positive views are many we pay more attention to favorable information, we surround ourselves with those who provide it, and we accept it uncritically (Gilbert 134).In many instance one creates his own perception to suit his way of thinking, so the individual could be in the center of his world. He seemed to regard this loss of visual imagery as a prerequi site for the full development, the heightening, of his other senses (Sacks 304). Most people see nice blind as unfortunate event, but according to this person it helped him to improve his other senses. The tabloids dubbed Goetz the subway vigilante and the death wish shooter (Gladwell 153). Rather than seeing Goetz as a lunatic the newspapers depicted him as a hero.So this shows the difference in perception between people and how it varies from individuals. Importantly since each persons perception varies it is hard to claim whose perception is right or wrong because ultimately is at that place a right perception of the world that e actuallybody should be following? Even when viewing a painting everybody has their own interpretation of the art. No one claims there is only one right perception rather the different perceptions are exactly different approaches towards looking at the world. It was simply inconceivable that someone could pull a gun on someone else on the subway and be called a hero for it. (Gladwell 154) shows how different viewpoints affect the verdicts of a situation. A hero to some people might be a baddie to others and it is hard to claim who is the right hero. The difference in subjectivity among people will always create a discrepancy of opinions among people. Since a variety of perception exists, then is it possible to have a perfect set and stone right and wrong rules in life? The context of a given librate plays a huge role in deciding the morality of the event. Morality is very much depended on the background information of the event.It is very hard to dictate the morality of an issue without seeing the bigger picture. Most people might see stealing as a wrong act, but what if someone steal a piece of bread in order to make sure he does not die from starvation, is that still a wrong act? In a situation like that one might feel sympathetic to that poor fellow and probably will see stealing as commonsensible in that given situation. We do not realize that our views will change (Gilbert 135), the idea of morality varies on the situation because the context of the event directly affects morality. sightlessness now becomes for him a dark paradoxical gift.This is not just compensation, but a whole new order, a new mode of human macrocosm (Sacks 305), in many aspects blind people do not see their condition as a curse or burden rather a different approach towards living and for most sighted people it might be hard to understand and accept this approach. That there are instances where you sess scram normal people from good schools and happy families and good neighborhoods and powerfully affect their behavior merely by changing the immediate expound of their situation (Gladwell 162) this shows how the little details of an event plays huge role in the outcomes of an event.Essentially, context of a situation is what dictates morality and it is going to be almost impossible to label morality as set and stone as somet hing like the Ten Commandments because the context always changes. Even though the standards of morality vary according to the situation there are some aspects of morality that one subconsciously accepts. Some ethics are universally considered wrong and ones mind without even one knowing already knows that some choices are not right. That is wherefore the mind tends to usually question the choices one makes.When we cook facts, we are similarly unaware of why we are doing it, and this turns out to be a good thing, because deliberate attempts to generate positive views (Gilbert 134), subconsciously to some extend individuals are aware of the morality fundament an action and this will help individuals to make their decisions wisely. To what extent are we our experiences, our reactions shaped, predetermined, by our brains, and to what extend do we shape our own brains (Sacks 303), There are some emotions and judgments that are simply preinstalled in ones mind which aids an individual in making choices that are difficult.After a while the bad guys wised up and began to leave their weapons home and pay their fares (Gladwell 157) this shows how there is a consciousness inside individuals that helps in guiding with decision making. When making a choice that might cut pain to us or others ones mind will usually try to suggest against that decision. That is why the idea of taking an innocent persons life is universally seen as a wrongful act in societies.Therefore, there is a sense of unconscious morality that lies within the black Maria of most individuals. Achieving a complete form of morality is a very idealistic thought because practically its not possible. There are unceasingly many ways of perceiving morality and it would be impossible to set a standard that would suit all the time. Too often people with sight take ont see anything (Sacks 310). There are parts that even ones eye sometimes cannot capture meaning that sometimes its simply not possible to accou nt for all the possibilities.The benefit of all this unconscious cookery is that it works, but the cost is that it makes us strangers to ourselves (Gilbert 135). People sometime engage in activities without being aware of the magnitude of the situation. They are both based on the premise that an epidemic can be reversed, can be tipped, by tinkering with the smallest details of the immediate environment (Gladwell 157) the intensity of the situation has a huge influence on the decision of the individual.Due to all this, perceiving morality completely would be very difficult. Also having a perfect morality would require illimitable knowledge which humans do not possess. As an individual one is limited at what he observes at a given time and there are limitations for each individual in this world. However, through the perceptions of many individuals, people will be able to come up with a better understanding of morality. Even with the limitations each individual has a small understandi ng of morality in the back of his head.Essentially, when all these understanding that are possessed by individuals are combined then a suitable set of standards will be formed that can accompany most situations. The collective effort of people will help to generate a better set of morality that will help in creating a peaceful environment for people to live in. That is why it is important to have many different perceptions of morality because they all eventually lead to creating set aside rules that will be suitable for the well-being of a society.Despite not being able to have an absolute morality with infallible accuracy and with infinite knowledge, an applicable method of sensing morality is still practical. Individuals lack the ability to have a perfect morality because for one to acquire it in shutdown one needs to possess infinite amount of knowledge. Despite this back drop each individual innately has the ability to know morality in small parts and therefore combining the s mall parts of every individual will help to achieve a suitable set of codes.The differences in perception between people only aids to benefit humans in portraying a better understanding of morality. That is why it is important that there are different types of perceptions because if there was only one view then a very limited and narrow minded principle would be familiar in the world. The different pathways of thinking done by people finally leads to achieving a suitable mode of morality. An absolute form of morality will neer be possible in this imperfect world, however, that does not mean accomplishing a reasonable standard is impossible.